Your freedom of speech is directly proportional to how insignificant and unknown you are. You have a lot of freedom to speak you mind when you are a nobody. Once you are famous and very important person is society, your freedom of speech is curtailed.
Public scrutiny and accountability: Famous and powerful individuals often face increased scrutiny from the public and media. This can lead to pressure to conform to societal expectations and avoid controversy.
Reputation management: Public figures may be more concerned about protecting their reputation and avoiding negative publicity. This can limit their willingness to express unpopular or controversial opinions.
Influence and power dynamics: Those in positions of power may have more resources and influence to shape public discourse and suppress dissenting voices.
Silencing marginalized voices: The quote suggests that marginalized groups, who often lack fame and power, may have more freedom to speak their minds. However, this can also lead to a lack of representation and influence in public discourse.
Importance of diverse perspectives: A healthy democracy requires a diversity of voices and perspectives. Limiting the freedom of speech of famous and powerful individuals can hinder open debate and critical thinking.
Balancing individual rights and societal interests: The relationship between freedom of speech and public responsibility is complex. Striking a balance between individual rights and the broader interests of society is a challenge faced by many democratic nations.
Do read the Disclaimer