The idea that Satan’s greatest trick is to convince people evil isn’t real adds a layer of intrigue, suggesting that denial is the ultimate deception that keeps us from confronting what we need to overcome. Let’s dive into this.
Evil as Resistance for Moral Growth
Your analogy is spot-on: just as physical strength comes from pushing against resistance, moral and ethical development often emerges from resisting temptations or primal instincts—like greed, anger, or selfishness. This aligns with a long-standing philosophical and religious idea that challenges are essential for growth. In theodicy, for instance, some argue that evil exists to test us, to give us opportunities to define our character through the choices we make. Without that resistance, as you suggest, there’s no chance to flex or strengthen our moral fiber. It’s like a gym for the soul—evil provides the weights, and our effort to lift them builds us into better beings.
The Deception of Denial
The notion that evil’s first rule—or Satan’s greatest trick—is to convince people it doesn’t exist is a powerful one. If we doubt evil’s reality, we lower our defenses, making it easier to slip into wrongdoing without even realizing it. This idea echoes through literature and theology. In C.S. Lewis’s The Screwtape Letters, for example, demons subtly nudge humans toward sin by making it seem trivial or unreal. It’s a brilliant trap: if we don’t believe in the weight, we won’t bother lifting it, and our moral muscles atrophy. Your point suggests that awareness is critical—we have to recognize evil to resist it.
Is Evil External or Internal?
Here’s something to chew on: what if evil isn’t just an outside force—like a tempter whispering in our ear—but also something inside us? Thinkers like Carl Jung talk about the “shadow,” the darker parts of our psyche we’d rather ignore. In this view, lifting the weight isn’t only about resisting external temptations but also confronting our own capacity for harm. Your analogy still holds—moral growth comes from resistance—but it might mean the weight is partly our own making. That adds depth: we’re not just battling Satan’s tricks but wrestling with ourselves.
The Necessity of Friction
Your take implies that ease and comfort could stunt moral growth. If there’s no resistance, no heavy weight to lift, we don’t get stronger. History backs this up—think of how moral progress often follows crises, like civil rights movements born from oppression. But it raises a question: can we grow morally without suffering or evil? Is the friction you describe necessary, or could there be another way to build that ethical muscle?
Evil, Free Will, and Vigilance
Your view also touches on free will. If evil is the resistance we lift, it suggests that our ability to choose—between giving in or pushing back—is what fuels moral growth. Denying evil’s existence could erode that choice, lulling us into a passive, relativistic haze where good and evil are just opinions. But if evil is real and objective, as you seem to imply, then resisting it becomes a universal call to action. It’s not optional—it’s the workout we all have to show up for.
A Lifelong Lift
So, where does this leave us? If evil is the weight we lift to grow, and its greatest trick is convincing us it’s not there, then staying vigilant is key. We have to keep our eyes open, not just to external threats but to our own tendencies to rationalize or dismiss them. It’s a constant moral exercise, a lifelong process of lifting that weight, even when it’s heavy or cloaked in denial.
Do read the Disclaimer