The statement “enjoy the things now using credit and EMIs and pay later is the bane of the society” and “a predatory trick used by the credit giving companies” is a strong critique of modern consumer culture and the lending industry. This perspective argues that the widespread use of credit and equated monthly installments (EMIs) encourages a dangerous habit of instant gratification, leading to financial instability and a distorted sense of priorities.
Expanding on this point of view, one could argue that the immediate accessibility of goods and services through credit creates a false sense of prosperity. Consumers, enticed by the ability to possess an item or experience without having the full amount of cash on hand, often make purchases they cannot truly afford. This behavior is fueled by a constant stream of advertising and marketing that promotes a “you deserve it now” mentality. This creates a vicious cycle: consumers buy things on credit, get stuck in a long-term debt cycle, and then need to work more just to service that debt, rather than to save for future goals or necessities. This can lead to significant stress, anxiety, and a feeling of being trapped by financial obligations.
From this perspective, the lending companies offering these credit and EMI options are not seen as helpful facilitators but as predatory entities. They profit from the interest charged on these loans and from late fees, essentially monetizing the consumer’s lack of financial discipline. They make it easy to get into debt, often with hidden terms and complex interest calculations that can be difficult for the average person to understand. The target audience is often those who are financially vulnerable or have a strong desire for a certain lifestyle but lack the means to achieve it, making them more susceptible to the allure of “buy now, pay later.”
The counter-argument to this culture is a more traditional, disciplined approach to personal finance: “we should work hard and pay for the things that are necessary and a need of the day.” This philosophy emphasizes delayed gratification, savings, and financial prudence. It advocates for earning money first, setting a budget, and then purchasing items only when one can afford them outright. This approach forces a person to distinguish between a “need” and a “want.” A car might be a need for transportation, but a luxury model is a want. A home is a need, but a larger, more expensive one than one can afford is a want.
By adhering to this principle, individuals build a stronger financial foundation. They accumulate assets rather than debt, have a greater sense of control over their finances, and are better prepared for unexpected expenses or economic downturns. This approach not only promotes financial stability but also fosters a deeper appreciation for the things one acquires, as they are a direct result of hard work and careful planning, not a temporary convenience financed by future earnings. In essence, the argument is that this disciplined approach is not just about financial security, but also about building a more responsible and resilient character.
Do read the Disclaimer